| 1. | opinion no. 72 on subsidiarity, com(2015) 450, mtg. no. 361 |
| 2. | opinion no. 71, com(2015) 450, mtg no. 361 |
| 3. | opinion no. 70, com(2015) 337, mtg no. 360 |
| 4. | opinion no. 69, mtg no. 360 |
| 5. | opinion no. 68, mtg no. 351 |
| 6. | opinion no. 67, mtg no. 348 |
| 7. | opinion no. 66, mtg no. 342 |
| 8. | opinion no. 65, mtg no. 342 |
| 9. | opinion no. 60, com(2014) 284, mtg no. 277 |
| 10. | opinion no. 59, com(2014) 330, mtg no. 276 |
| 11. | opinion no. 58, com(2014) 158, mtg no. 270 |
| 12. | opinion no. 57, join(2014) 12, mtg no. 270 |
| 13. | opinion no. 56, mtg no. 265 |
| 14. | opinion no. 55, mtg no. 263 |
| 15. | opinion no. 54, mtg no. 262 |
| 16. | opinion no. 51, com(2014) 265, mtg no. 262 |
| 17. | opinion no. 50, com(2014) 20, mtg no. 235 |
| 18. | opinion no 49, com(2013) 919, mtg no 920 |
| 19. | opinion no. 48, com(2013) 758, mtg no. 215 |
| 20. | Opinion No. 47 on subsidiarity, com(2013) 751, mtg. no. 206 |
| 21. | opinion no. 41, com(2013) 300, mtg no. 173 |
| 22. | opinion no. 40 on subsidiarity, com(2013) 296, mtg no. 169 |
| 23. | opinion no. 39, com(2013) 296, mtg no. 169 |
| 24. | opinion no. 36, com(2013) 166, mtg no. 164 |
| 25. | Opinion no. 35, com(2013) 168, mtg no. 145 |
| 26. | opinion no. 34, com(2013) 133, mtg no. 144 |
| 27. | opinion no. 33 on subsidiarity, com(2013) 31, mtg no. 134 |
| 28. | opinion no. 32 on subsidiarity, com(2013) 29, mtg no. 134 |
| 29. | opinion no. 31, com(2013) 28, mtg no. 134 |
| 30. | opinion no. 30 on subsidiarity, com(2012) 614, mtg no. 110 |
| 31. | opinion no. 29, com(2012) 643, mtg no. 110 |
| 32. | opinion no. 28, com(2011) 895 and 896, mtg no. 109 |
| 33. | opinion no. 27, com(2012) 582 |
| 34. | Opinion No 26, com(2012) 628 |
| 35. | opinion no. 23 on subsidiarity, com(2012) 372, mtg no. 75 |
| 36. | opinion no. 22, com(2012) 416, mtg no. 73 |
| 37. | opinion no. 21 on subsidiarity, com(2012) 369, mtg no. 67 |
| 38. | opinion no. 20. COM(2012) 336, mtg no. 66 |
| 39. | opinion no. 15, com(2012) 167, mtg no. 52 |
| 40. | opinion no. 14, com(2012) 150, mtg no. 49 |
| 41. | opinion no. 13, com(2012) 64, mtg no. 44 |
| 42. | opinion no. 12, com(2012) 131, mtg no. 44 |
| 43. | opinion no. 11 on subsidiarity, com(2012) 130, mtg no. 43 |
| 44. | opinion no. 10, com(2012) 84, mtg no. 39 |
| 45. | opinion no. 9 on subsidiarity, com(2012) 48 and 49, mtg no. 36 |
| 46. | opinion no. 8, com(2011) 896, mtg no. 31 |
| 47. | opinion no. 7, com(2011) 851, mtg no. 28 |
| 48. | opinion no. 6, cohesion policy, mtg no. 16 |
| 49. | opinion no. 5 on subsidiarity, com(2011) 560, mtg no. 14 |
| 50. | opinion no. 4, com(2011) 688, mtg no. 10 |
| 51. | opinion no. 2, com(211) 632 and 633, mtg no. 6 |
| 52. | opinion no. 1, com(2011) 620-623, mtg no. 4 |